Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Data, Computation, and Information Systems (JDCIS) undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and relevance.
1. Initial Editorial Screening
-
Each submission is first reviewed by the editor to ensure it fits the journal’s focus and scope, formatting requirements, and author guidelines.
-
Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria may be returned to the authors for revision before being sent for peer review.
2. Double-Blind Peer Review
-
JDCIS uses a double-blind peer review system, meaning both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the process.
-
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
-
Reviewers assess the paper’s originality, methodology, clarity, relevance, and overall scientific contribution.
3. Reviewer Recommendations
Reviewers may recommend one of the following decisions:
-
Accept without revision
-
Accept with minor revision
-
Major revision required
-
Reject
4. Author Revision
-
Authors are given an opportunity to revise their manuscripts in accordance with reviewer comments within a specified time (typically 2–3 weeks).
-
Revised manuscripts must be accompanied by a response to reviewer document detailing all changes made.
5. Final Decision
-
The editor evaluates the revised manuscript based on reviewer recommendations and the author’s responses.
-
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on acceptance, further revision, or rejection.
6. Publication
-
Accepted manuscripts are scheduled for publication in the next available issue (published four times a year).
-
All accepted papers undergo copyediting, proofreading, and layout editing before final publication.








